TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Partial Appeal Success: Capital Goods Credit Granted for Machinery, Spares Disallowed</h1> <h3>KAVERI YARNS & FABRICS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MADURAI</h3> KAVERI YARNS & FABRICS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MADURAI - 2010 (251) E.L.T. 156 (Tri. - Chennai) Issues: Determination of admissibility of capital goods credit for various items under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Analysis:1. Ring Frame: The Commissioner disallowed the capital goods credit for the Ring Frame on the basis that it was purchased on a hire-purchase agreement before the relevant amendment to Rule 57R. However, the appellants demonstrated that they purchased the Ring Frame outright from a specific entity, even though they took a loan and hypothecated the same. The ownership of the Ring Frame was established to vest with the appellants, making them eligible for the credit amounting to Rs. 1,93,979.2. Calendering Machine, Craft Mounting Equipment, Base Cylinder Grinder, and Linkerin Machine: These items were challenged for their eligibility as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. The appellants successfully argued that these machines were essential for the production process of cotton yarn, falling within the definition of capital goods as per Rule 57Q. The machines were found to be used in producing or processing goods, making them eligible for the capital goods credit.3. Spares for OMA 121600 AACS, Self Adhesive Tapes, and Joint Adhesive: The appellants failed to prove that these items qualified as capital goods during the relevant period. As a result, the credit for these items, totaling Rs. 4,165, was disallowed by the Tribunal.4. Overall Decision: The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting capital goods credit for the Ring Frame, Calendering Machine, Craft Mounting Equipment, Base Cylinder Grinder, and Linkerin Machine. However, the credit for the spares and adhesive items was disallowed. The decision was made after a thorough assessment of each item's relevance to the manufacturing process and the applicable rules under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive understanding of the issues involved and the Tribunal's decision regarding the admissibility of capital goods credit for the various items in question.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
