Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, having made bona fide attempts to pay the amount determined under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 but being prevented by technical difficulties in the electronic payment process during the Covid-19 period, was entitled to make payment manually and obtain the benefit of the Scheme.
Analysis: The declaration filed by the petitioner was accepted and Form SVLDRS-3 was issued determining the amount payable. The record showed that the petitioner attempted payment through RTGS within time, but the amount was returned by the receiving bank, and the challan could not be generated successfully on the portal. The Court held that the petitioner's efforts were bona fide and were made to comply with the Scheme in extreme pandemic conditions. As the object of the Scheme is to reduce legacy litigation and permit settlement of dues, the substantive benefit could not be denied merely on procedural or technical grounds. The Court therefore exercised writ jurisdiction to ensure implementation of the Scheme in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Scheme, and the authorities were directed to accept the payment with interest and grant the discharge under the Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide attempt to comply with a beneficial tax settlement scheme cannot be defeated by procedural or technological obstacles where the assessee has otherwise been found eligible and the amount payable has been determined.