SC Dismisses SLP for 569-Day Delay; No Interference on Merits, Cites Past Rulings for Support. The SC dismissed the SLP due to a 'gross delay of 569 days' in filing, and after considering the merits, the Court chose not to interfere. The dismissal ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
SC Dismisses SLP for 569-Day Delay; No Interference on Merits, Cites Past Rulings for Support.
The SC dismissed the SLP due to a "gross delay of 569 days" in filing, and after considering the merits, the Court chose not to interfere. The dismissal was based on both procedural delay and case merits. The Court referenced previous decisions in similar cases to support its judgment. All pending applications were disposed of.
The Supreme Court, presided by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to a "gross delay of 569 days" in filing. Despite hearing the petitioner's counsel on the merits, the Court was "not inclined to interfere in the matter." The dismissal was based both on procedural delay and the merits of the case. The Court referenced its prior orders in similar cases, specifically the decisions in Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) 2, New Delhi vs. M/s MITSUI and Co. and The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. MITSUI and Company Ltd., to reinforce its judgment. Any pending applications were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
