Section 11D and Cenvat credit on capital goods are tested by duty liability at the relevant time, not later reclassification.
Section 11D of the Central Excise Act applies only where a person liable to pay duty has collected an amount as duty in excess of the duty assessed or determined; where the activity is no longer exigible to duty, amounts collected from buyers after that point do not satisfy those statutory conditions and cannot be recovered in cash. Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods is tested with reference to the time the goods are received by the manufacturer; credit validly taken does not lapse merely because the underlying process is later held not to amount to manufacture. The note records that both points were decided in favour of the assessee.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount collected from buyers after the activity was held not to amount to manufacture could be recovered in cash under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. (ii) Whether the balance Cenvat credit on capital goods lying on the relevant date was liable to be disallowed or treated as lapsed.
Issue (i): Whether the amount collected from buyers after the activity was held not to amount to manufacture could be recovered in cash under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Section 11D applies where a person liable to pay duty has collected an amount in excess of the duty assessed or determined and is required to credit that amount to the Central Government. Once the activity was no longer exigible to duty, the respondent was not a person liable to pay duty for the period in question. The amount collected after the relevant date therefore did not satisfy the statutory conditions for recovery under Section 11D.
Conclusion: The amount collected could not be recovered under Section 11D, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the balance Cenvat credit on capital goods lying on the relevant date was liable to be disallowed or treated as lapsed.
Analysis: Eligibility to Cenvat credit on capital goods is determined when the goods are received by the manufacturer. The capital goods had been received and used when duty was leviable and collected on the final product. In that situation, the credit already availed and lying in balance on the relevant date did not become inadmissible merely because the process was subsequently held not to amount to manufacture.
Conclusion: The balance Cenvat credit was not disallowable and did not lapse, and this issue was also decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed because neither the cash recovery under Section 11D nor the reversal of the balance Cenvat credit was sustainable on the facts and statutory framework applied.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 11D is attracted only when a person liable to pay duty has collected an excess amount as duty, and Cenvat credit on capital goods is to be tested with reference to the time of receipt of the goods.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
