Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and appellate order could be sustained when the assessee was not afforded a separate date for filing reply and hearing, as required for compliance with the hearing requirement under the GST law.
Analysis: The challenge centred on the absence of a separate hearing date and the consequent denial of an effective opportunity to respond. The Court applied the reasoning of an earlier Division Bench decision on the same point and treated that reasoning as governing the present facts. On that basis, the Court held that the impugned orders could not be sustained and that a fresh decision had to be taken after granting opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was left open for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioners an opportunity of hearing.