TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Tax Appeal Dismissal, Emphasizes Factual Basis</h1> <h3>SALEM STEEL COMPANY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX</h3> SALEM STEEL COMPANY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - [2010] 322 ITR 349 (Mad) Issues:1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order without independent reasoningRs.2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in confirming the addition to gross profit without considering the appellant's contentionsRs.Analysis:1. The appeal challenged the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order, questioning the lack of independent reasoning in upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order. The appellant argued that the Tribunal failed to address the grounds raised in the appeal adequately. Citing a previous case, the appellant sought similar relief. However, the High Court found no justification to extend the decision's benefit to the present case.2. The case involved a partnership firm engaged in the wholesale cement business. During the assessment year 2002-03, a survey revealed discrepancies in the firm's accounts, which were maintained on a computer without supporting vouchers or receipts. The Assessing Officer found irregularities and estimated the gross profit at 4% compared to the 2.77% declared by the assessee. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision, considering comparable cases and a .715% difference in gross profit. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision, leading to the current appeal.3. The High Court noted that the Assessing Officer highlighted the irregular maintenance of accounts and incomplete records during the survey. Due to discrepancies and lack of contemporary evidence, the gross profit declared by the assessee was not accepted. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) considered the comparative cases and the assessee's advantages, adding .715% to the gross profit. The Tribunal, after analyzing the facts, upheld the lower authorities' decisions. Given the factual nature of the issue, the High Court found no legal grounds to interfere and dismissed the appeal under section 260A.In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, emphasizing the proper consideration of facts by the lower authorities and the lack of legal questions warranting intervention.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
