Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 is invalid when it does not bear the signature of the assessing officer, and whether such defect can be cured by Sections 160 and 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The order challenged before the Court was an assessment order issued in Form GST DRC-07 without the signature of the assessing officer. The Court followed earlier Division Bench decisions holding that signature on an assessment order is not a dispensable formality and that the defect is not cured by the saving or service provisions in Sections 160 and 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Conclusion: The unsigned assessment order was held invalid and was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order under the GST regime must bear the signature of the assessing officer, and the absence of such signature renders the order invalid without being cured by Sections 160 and 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.