AP HC Overturns Denial of TDS Refund; Case Remanded for Reconsideration Under CBIC Circular, Completion in 3 Months. The AP HC set aside the orders of the Assessing and Appellate Authorities, which had denied the petitioner's refund of TDS amounts in the cash ledger ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
AP HC Overturns Denial of TDS Refund; Case Remanded for Reconsideration Under CBIC Circular, Completion in 3 Months.
The AP HC set aside the orders of the Assessing and Appellate Authorities, which had denied the petitioner's refund of TDS amounts in the cash ledger under the GST Act. The court acknowledged a CBIC circular permitting such refunds and remanded the case for reconsideration based on this circular. The authorities were directed to complete the reconsideration within three months, with no order as to costs, and all pending interlocutory applications were closed.
In the case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the petitioner, a registered dealer under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, sought a refund of the accumulated TDS amounts in the cash ledger after discharging tax liability using available ITC. The Assessing Authority initially rejected this refund application on October 17, 2019, citing the "Principle of Unjust Enrichment." The Appellate Authority upheld this decision, leading the petitioner to file a Writ Petition with the High Court.
The petitioner's counsel argued that a subsequent circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (Circular No. 166/22/2021-GST, dated November 17, 2021) allows for the refund of TDS/TCS amounts deposited in the electronic cash ledger, as per the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 54, read with subsection (6) of section 49 of the CGST Act.
The High Court, acknowledging this circular, set aside both the Appellate and Original orders and remanded the matter back to the respective authorities for reconsideration in light of the new circular. The court directed that this reconsideration be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the order and noted that there would be no order as to costs. Pending interlocutory applications were also closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.