Supreme Court dismisses petition due to 162-day filing delay and lack of merit; related applications also disposed of. The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 162 days in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained. Additionally, the Court found no ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses petition due to 162-day filing delay and lack of merit; related applications also disposed of.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 162 days in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained. Additionally, the Court found no merit in the petition, leading to its dismissal both on the grounds of delay and on merits. Any pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
Supreme Court Judgment Summary
Case Citation: TMI
Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan
Representation for Petitioner: Mr. Raghavendra P Shankar, A.S.G., Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Mr. Gaurang Bhushan, Adv., Mr. Karan Lahiri, Adv., Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv.
Order:
1. The Court noted a "delay of 162 days in filing the Special Leave Petition," which was not "satisfactorily explained." 2. Upon review, the Court found no merit in the Special Leave Petition. 3. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was "dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits." 4. Any pending applications are disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
