Supreme Court dismisses petition due to 164-day delay; petitioner fails to justify overturning Punjab and Haryana HC decision. In TMI 51866799, the SC dismissed a Special Leave Petition due to a 'gross delay of 164 days' in filing, which the petitioner failed to adequately ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses petition due to 164-day delay; petitioner fails to justify overturning Punjab and Haryana HC decision.
In TMI 51866799, the SC dismissed a Special Leave Petition due to a "gross delay of 164 days" in filing, which the petitioner failed to adequately explain. The Court found no justification to overturn the High Court of Punjab and Haryana's decision. The petition was dismissed on grounds of delay and merits, and all pending applications were disposed of.
In the Supreme Court judgment cited as TMI 51866799, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, the Court addressed a Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner. The Court noted a "gross delay of 164 days" in filing the petition, which was not "satisfactorily explained" by the petitioner. Furthermore, the Court found "no reason to interfere with the impugned order" from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was "dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits." All pending applications were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
