Supreme Court Rejects Petition Due to 123-Day Filing Delay and Lack of Merit; All Applications Disposed Of. The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 'gross delay of 123 days' in filing, which was inadequately explained by the petitioner. The Court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Petition Due to 123-Day Filing Delay and Lack of Merit; All Applications Disposed Of.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a "gross delay of 123 days" in filing, which was inadequately explained by the petitioner. The Court found no justification to interfere with the HC's impugned order. The petition was rejected on grounds of both delay and lack of merit, and all pending applications were disposed of.
In the Supreme Court case presided over by Hon'ble Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, the petitioner, represented by Mr. N Venkataraman, A.S.G., and other counsel, sought a Special Leave Petition. The Court noted a "gross delay of 123 days" in filing the petition, which was "not satisfactorily explained" by the petitioner. Furthermore, the Court found "no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court." Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed on grounds of both delay and merits. All pending applications were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
