Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, pending constitution of the Goods and Services Tax Tribunal, the assessee was entitled to the statutory benefit of stay of recovery on depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount under the amended appellate scheme, and whether consequential attachment of the bank account was liable to be lifted.
Analysis: The amendment to Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 reduced the pre-deposit requirement to 10% for maintaining an appeal before the Tribunal. Since the Tribunal had not yet been constituted, the assessee could not be deprived of the statutory stay benefit on account of the respondents' failure to make the Tribunal functional. At the same time, the stay protection was treated as linked to the future availability of the appellate forum, so the assessee was required to file the appeal once the Tribunal became functional.
Conclusion: On deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount, the assessee was held entitled to stay of recovery, and any bank account attachment pursuant to the demand was directed to be released. The benefit was made contingent upon filing the appeal before the Tribunal after its constitution.