Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order under Section 73 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be challenged on the ground that proceedings had already been initiated by another GST authority, and whether interim protection against coercive action should be granted.
Analysis: The petitioner questioned the authority of the respondent to proceed with the original order when earlier proceedings had been commenced by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence on the basis of a prior search. Reliance was placed on the bar under Section 6(2)(b) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to contend that parallel initiation was impermissible. The Court issued notice and, pending further consideration, protected the petitioner by restraining coercive action under the impugned order.
Outcome: Notice issued. Ad-interim protection against coercive action was granted in relation to the impugned order.