Serious economic offence bail test: gravity of allegations and trial risks outweighed liberty, so regular bail was refused.

Regular bail was refused in a prosecution alleging a large-scale liquor scam, corruption and forgery, because the Court found that the gravity of the accusations, the prima facie prosecution material, and the risk of interference with the trial outweighed the general rule favouring liberty. The Court applied settled bail factors, including the seriousness of the offence, the possibility of absconding or tampering with evidence, and the strength of the case at the investigation stage, and noted that multiple charge-sheets, voluminous records and numerous witnesses were involved. It held that prolonged custody, parity and the presumption of innocence did not, on these facts, justify release on bail.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution alleging a large-scale liquor scam, corruption and forgery, despite prolonged custody, completion of substantial investigation, and reliance on parity and constitutional safeguards.

Analysis: The application was assessed on the settled bail factors, including the nature and gravity of the accusations, the severity of the punishment, the likelihood of absconding, tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, and the overall strength of the prima facie material. The Court noted that the case involved serious economic offences, a large syndicate allegation, multiple charge-sheets, voluminous records and a large number of witnesses. It further held that while liberty, presumption of innocence and the rule that bail is the norm remain relevant, those considerations do not automatically outweigh the seriousness of the allegations in a case of this nature. The Court also considered the claim of parity and the contention that investigation was substantially complete, but found that the gravity of the offence and the material relied upon by the prosecution weighed against release on bail.

Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to regular bail.

Ratio Decidendi: In serious economic offence cases, even after substantial progress in investigation, bail may be refused where the prima facie material, gravity of accusation, and risk of interference with the trial outweigh the general rule favouring liberty.

---