Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the show cause notice on the ground that material gathered during search, including data allegedly extracted from electronic devices, was relied upon without compliance with Section 145 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the certificate contemplated by Section 145(2), warranted interference.
Analysis: The challenge was founded on the plea that the material proposed to be relied upon in the proceedings was inadmissible for want of compliance with the procedural requirement governing reliance on documentary material. The Court held that the petitioner would be free to contest the admissibility of the evidence in the proceedings themselves, and that this afforded no basis to interdict the show cause notice at the writ stage.
Conclusion: The challenge to the show cause notice was not entertained and the writ petition was dismissed.