Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of a constituted GST Tribunal, the assessee was entitled to stay of recovery on deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount, and what further obligation would arise once the Tribunal becomes functional.
Analysis: The order records that the amended pre-deposit requirement under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had reduced the amount from 20% to 10%, but the amendment was to operate from 01.11.2024. Since the Tribunal had not yet been constituted, the Court extended the statutory benefit of stay of recovery on payment of 10% of the tax in dispute, treating the petitioner as entitled to the benefit that could not be denied merely because the Tribunal was unavailable. The relief was made conditional and not open-ended: the petitioner would have to file the appeal before the Tribunal once it is constituted and made functional, and the authorities would be free to proceed in accordance with law if the appeal is not filed within the prescribed time.
Outcome: On deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount, the petitioner obtained stay of recovery and release of any bank account attachment, with the obligation to pursue the statutory appeal before the Tribunal after its constitution.