Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order suspending the Look Out Circular and permitting the respondent to travel abroad called for interference.
Analysis: The investigation had been pending for a substantial period and no charge sheet had been filed. The respondent had participated in the investigation when summoned and had disclosed the required information. An undertaking had been given that he would return within five days of intimation if his presence was required, and no definite time-frame for completion of the investigation had been shown. In these circumstances, the restriction on foreign travel was not justified.
Conclusion: The order granting permission to travel abroad and suspending the Look Out Circular was upheld and no interference was warranted.