Cenvat Credit interest arises only on wrongful utilisation, not mere delayed reversal, subject to factual verification of balance.

Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 distinguishes between credit wrongly taken but not utilised and credit wrongly taken and utilised. Interest is attracted only in the latter situation, so delayed reversal does not by itself create interest liability. On the stated facts, if the assessee had not utilised the credit and had maintained a Cenvat balance equal to or above the amount to be reversed, no interest would be payable. The factual question whether the credit was actually utilised and whether sufficient balance existed required verification by the original authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether interest is payable on delayed reversal of Cenvat credit where the credit was taken in respect of goods destroyed in fire and remission was granted, and whether interest liability arises only upon utilization of the credit under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis: Rule 14 distinguishes between credit wrongly taken but not utilised and credit taken and utilised wrongly. Interest is attracted only in the latter situation. On the facts, the appellant's case was that the accumulated Cenvat credit balance remained equal to or above the amount required to be reversed, and if that factual position is verified, no interest would be payable. The factual aspect of actual utilization and sufficiency of balance required verification by the original authority.

Conclusion: Interest is not payable if the appellant had not utilised the Cenvat credit and had maintained a balance equal to or above the amount reversed. The matter was remitted for verification of that factual issue.

---