Bail cancellation under Section 439(2) needs proof of breach; no interference where no violation was shown.

Bail cancellation under Section 439(2) requires material showing breach of bail conditions or other sufficient grounds; where no complaint had been filed and no violation of the imposed conditions was shown, there was no basis to interfere with bail already granted. The note also records that the court declined to examine the merits of the allegations at the bail-cancellation stage and treated the maximum punishment under the Customs Act as insufficient, on the facts stated, to justify cancellation. On that footing, the application was not maintainable on the facts presented and no ground for cancellation was made out.

---

---

Issues: Whether the bail cancellation application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was liable to be allowed on the facts and circumstances of the case.

Analysis: The record showed that no complaint had yet been filed against the respondents, and there was no material showing breach of the conditions imposed in the bail order. The Court also declined to enter into the merits of the allegations at the stage of bail cancellation. The maximum punishment under the Customs Act was noted to be seven years, and the circumstances did not justify interference with the bail already granted.

Conclusion: The bail cancellation application was not maintainable on the facts presented and no ground was made out for cancellation of bail.

---