Private tour operators providing Haj and Umrah pilgrimage services liable for service tax from July 2012

CESTAT Allahabad confirmed service tax levy on tour operator services for Haj and Umrah pilgrimages. Following SC precedent in All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association case, the tribunal held that private tour operators providing these services are liable for service tax from July 1, 2012, when the Negative List concept was introduced. The services are not covered under Mega Exemption Notification. Revenue's appeal was allowed, confirming the tax demand while permitting small scale exemption where applicable.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Applicability of Service Tax on Tour Operator Services for Haj and Umrah.
2. Demand of Service Tax on Legal Consultancy Services.
3. Eligibility for Small Scale Exemption for Travel Agent and Business Auxiliary Services.
4. Imposition of Interest and Penalty under the Finance Act, 1994.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Service Tax on Tour Operator Services for Haj and Umrah:

The primary issue was whether the services provided by private tour operators for Haj and Umrah are liable for service tax post the introduction of the Negative List regime on 01.07.2012. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court judgment in the case of All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association, which clarified that service tax is applicable to services provided by private tour operators for Haj and Umrah as these services are not exempted under the Mega Exemption Notification. The Supreme Court distinguished between services provided by the Haj Committee, which are exempt, and those by private operators, which are not, due to the lack of a profit motive and statutory duties associated with the Haj Committee.

2. Demand of Service Tax on Legal Consultancy Services:

The Tribunal examined the demand for service tax on legal consultancy services amounting to Rs. 8413/-. The appellant contended that payments were made to a Chartered Accountant, not an advocate, and no evidence was provided to show otherwise. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds to levy service tax on these payments as legal consultancy services.

3. Eligibility for Small Scale Exemption for Travel Agent and Business Auxiliary Services:

The Tribunal evaluated whether the appellant was eligible for small scale exemption, noting that the aggregate amounts received for Travel Agent services and Business Auxiliary Services did not exceed the threshold of ten lakh rupees in any financial year. Therefore, the appellant was eligible for the small scale exemption under the relevant notification, which exempts service providers with a turnover below a specified amount.

4. Imposition of Interest and Penalty under the Finance Act, 1994:

The Tribunal addressed the imposition of interest and penalties under Sections 75 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The original authority had imposed penalties on the grounds of suppression of facts and deliberate evasion of service tax. The Tribunal, however, found that the appellant had not challenged the amounts detailed in the show cause notice and that the services were taxable. The Tribunal upheld the imposition of interest and penalties as justified under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, citing the Supreme Court's stance that penalties are mandatory in cases of suppression and evasion.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restored the order of the Original Authority, confirming the demand of service tax on tour operator services for Haj and Umrah, while allowing the small scale exemption for other services and upholding the imposition of interest and penalties. The appeal filed by the revenue was allowed, and the order of the Original Authority was reinstated.

---