Sugar syrup with 78.2% content during biscuit manufacturing ruled excisable despite final product exemption

CESTAT Bangalore held that sugar syrup with 78.2% sugar content produced as an intermediate product during biscuit manufacturing is excisable, despite biscuits being exempt from duty. The tribunal applied the marketability test from Karnataka Soaps case, finding the syrup stable and marketable regardless of actual market sales. However, since the issue involved legal interpretation rather than suppression of facts, extended limitation period was rejected. Revenue's appeal was partly allowed - sugar syrup deemed excisable but demand restricted to normal limitation period with no penalty imposed on the appellant.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:

• Whether the sugar syrup, an intermediary product with a sugar content of 78.2% by weight, produced during the manufacture of biscuits, is excisable and liable to duty.
• Whether the benefit of Notification No.67/1995, which exempts certain inputs used in the manufacture of excisable goods, applies when the final product (biscuits) is exempted from duty.
• Whether the sugar syrup meets the test of marketability as defined under the Central Excise Act, 1944.
• Whether the extended period of limitation can be invoked for the demand of duty.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Excisability of Sugar Syrup

• Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The determination of excisability hinges on whether the sugar syrup is considered 'goods' under Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which requires the product to be marketable.
• Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court relied on precedents such as the Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. and Escorts Ltd. cases, which emphasize that marketability does not require actual sales but the capability of being sold.
• Key Evidence and Findings: The sugar syrup in question had a sugar content of 78.2% by weight, as confirmed by a chemical analysis. The court found this sufficient to establish marketability.
• Application of Law to Facts: The court concluded that the sugar syrup is stable and marketable, thus excisable, as it meets the criteria of being capable of being bought and sold.
• Treatment of Competing Arguments: The court dismissed the respondent's argument, supported by the Commissioner (Appeals), that the syrup was not marketable due to lack of evidence of actual sales.
• Conclusions: The sugar syrup is excisable as it is a marketable product.

Issue 2: Applicability of Notification No.67/1995

• Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Notification No.67/1995 exempts certain inputs used in the manufacture of excisable goods, but not when the final product is exempt from duty.
• Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court interpreted that since the final product (biscuits) is exempt from duty, the benefit of the notification does not extend to the sugar syrup.
• Conclusions: The notification does not apply, and the sugar syrup is liable to duty.

Issue 3: Marketability of Sugar Syrup

• Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The test of marketability is whether the product can be bought and sold, not whether it is actually sold.
• Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court referenced the Mysore Sugar Company Ltd. case, which established that sugar syrup with a sugar content above 65% is marketable.
• Conclusions: The sugar syrup is marketable and thus excisable.

Issue 4: Extended Period of Limitation

• Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The extended period of limitation applies in cases of suppression or misstatement, but not for interpretative issues.
• Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court found that the issue was one of legal interpretation, not suppression of facts.
• Conclusions: The demand is limited to the normal period of limitation, and no penalty is imposed.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

• Preserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: "To satisfy the test of marketability, the product need not be bought and sold in the market. If it is capable of being bought and sold, then the test of marketability is satisfied."
• Core Principles Established: The capability of being marketed suffices for excisability; actual sales are not necessary. The benefit of exemption notifications does not apply when the final product is exempt from duty.
• Final Determinations on Each Issue: The sugar syrup is excisable, the notification does not apply, the product is marketable, and the demand is limited to the normal period of limitation without penalties.

---