Assessee wins appeal on sections 54F and 54B deductions for house construction and agricultural land purchase

The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee's appeal regarding deductions under sections 54F and 54B. For section 54F, the tribunal accepted evidence of house construction worth Rs. 1,25,20,000 on ancestral land between January 2013 to July 2015, noting the assessee had sufficient funds from agricultural land sale of Rs. 4,31,25,000. For section 54B, deduction was allowed for agricultural land purchase of Rs. 3,08,33,650, despite being bought in wife's name for stamp duty savings. The tribunal also deleted the addition of Rs. 40,00,000 as unexplained cash credit, accepting the brother's affidavit and cash flow statement as adequate explanation for the unsecured loan transaction.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Deduction under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The appellant/assessee contended that the learned CIT(A) erred in not allowing the deduction under Section 54F of the Act amounting to Rs. 1,14,39,350/-. The assessee claimed to have constructed a house property on ancestral land using the proceeds from the sale of land. The evidence provided included a valuation report, ownership documents, and a certificate from a local councillor confirming the construction. The CIT(A) disallowed the exemption due to lack of evidence regarding ownership and construction. However, the tribunal observed that the evidence submitted by the assessee, such as the valuation report and cash flow statement, sufficiently demonstrated the construction of the house. It was noted that the house was constructed on Lal Dora land, which did not require municipal permission. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and allowed the deduction under Section 54F.

2. Deduction under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The appellant/assessee argued that the learned CIT(A) wrongly denied the deduction under Section 54B of the Act amounting to Rs. 3,08,33,650/-. The CIT(A) held that the agricultural land was purchased in the name of the assessee's wife, and thus, the deduction was not permissible. The assessee claimed the land was purchased within two years, and the decision to register it in the wife's name was due to illness and to save stamp duty. The tribunal referred to judicial precedents, including CIT vs. Gurnam Singh, which supported the assessee's position that the land being used for agricultural purposes justified the deduction, even if registered in a family member's name. Consequently, the tribunal found the assessee eligible for the deduction under Section 54B and overturned the CIT(A)'s decision.

3. Addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- as Unexplained Cash Credit:

The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- as an unsecured loan. The assessee explained that the amount was a transaction between him and his brother, Shri Brahm Singh, where payments for land purchases were made on each other's behalf and later squared off. The evidence included an affidavit from Brahm Singh, cash flow statements, and sale agreements. The tribunal found the explanation and evidence credible, indicating that the transaction was genuine and not an unexplained cash credit. Therefore, the tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 40,00,000/- addition.

Conclusion:

The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the deductions under Sections 54F and 54B of the Income Tax Act, and directed the deletion of the Rs. 40,00,000/- addition on account of unexplained cash credit. The appeal was pronounced in favor of the assessee on December 18, 2024.

---