Permanent establishment under DTAA requires core business presence or dependent-agent authority; liaison work and software access were insufficient.

Article explains that a fixed place permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-US DTAA requires a place of business at the foreign enterprise's disposal through which its core business is carried on; liaison functions, support work and other auxiliary activities do not satisfy that test. It also states that a dependent agent permanent establishment arises only where a person in India habitually concludes contracts, secures orders, or otherwise acts within the treaty conditions; independent agents acting at arm's length do not create such presence. Software installed at Indian agents' premises was described as a communication and verification tool, not a place of business, so it did not create a permanent establishment.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India under Article 5 of the DTAA. (ii) Whether the liaison office or Indian agents created a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5. (iii) Whether the deployment of software at the Indian agents' premises resulted in a permanent establishment.

Issue (i): Whether the liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India under Article 5 of the DTAA.

Analysis: The relevant test required a fixed place of business through which the enterprise's own business was wholly or partly carried on, with the place being at the enterprise's disposal and answering the characteristics of stability, productivity, and dependence. The liaison office was authorised only to carry on liaison functions, communication, training, and support activities, and was prohibited by RBI conditions from undertaking commercial activity, entering business contracts, or receiving remuneration. Its reported functions remained peripheral to the principal remittance business, and the actual transaction was completed outside India. Those activities therefore did not amount to the conduct of the core business through a fixed place in India.

Conclusion: The liaison office did not constitute a fixed place permanent establishment.

Issue (ii): Whether the liaison office or Indian agents created a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5.

Analysis: A dependent agent permanent establishment required proof that a person in India habitually exercised authority to conclude contracts, habitually secured orders, or otherwise acted on behalf of the foreign enterprise in the manner specified by the treaty. The Indian agents were independent third parties, remunerated at arm's length, and had no authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the enterprise. The liaison office itself did not secure orders or conclude contracts, and the material on record did not satisfy the treaty conditions for deeming a dependent agent presence.

Conclusion: No dependent agent permanent establishment was made out.

Issue (iii): Whether the deployment of software at the Indian agents' premises resulted in a permanent establishment.

Analysis: The software was only a communication and verification tool enabling the Indian agents to interface with the foreign enterprise's systems abroad. The treaty concept of permanent establishment in its fixed-place form was directed to tangible premises or physical facilities, not software as intangible property. The software did not itself create a place of business, and the agents' premises were not placed at the disposal of the enterprise merely because the software was installed there.

Conclusion: The software did not create a permanent establishment.

Final Conclusion: The treaty tests for a fixed place permanent establishment and a dependent agent permanent establishment were not satisfied, and the software-based contention also failed. The appeals therefore could not succeed.

Ratio Decidendi: For a permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-USA DTAA, the foreign enterprise must have a fixed place of business at its disposal through which its core business is carried on, or a person in India must satisfy the specific dependent-agent conditions; auxiliary liaison functions and mere software-enabled communication do not meet that threshold.

---