Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adverse GST orders were liable to be quashed for want of personal hearing before their passing.
Analysis: Section 75(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 requires that an opportunity of personal hearing be afforded before passing an adverse order. The orders under challenge were passed without granting such hearing, and the Court applied the coordinate Bench view that omission of the hearing requirement vitiates the adverse determination.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and set aside, and the matter was sent back for a fresh reply and hearing followed by a reasoned order.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded on the ground of denial of personal hearing, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Section 75(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applies, an adverse order passed without granting personal hearing cannot be sustained and must be set aside for fresh adjudication.