Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed on the petitioners under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 could be sustained when no show cause notice was served on them and no opportunity of hearing was granted.
Analysis: The impugned order imposed a substantial penalty on the petitioners, who were directors, although the show cause notice had been issued only to the company and was neither addressed to nor served upon the petitioners. No opportunity was afforded to them to answer the proposed action before the order was passed. The absence of notice and hearing constituted a clear breach of the principles of natural justice, and the Court followed its earlier view in a similar matter involving an independent director.
Conclusion: The impugned Order-in-Original was quashed and set aside insofar as it concerned the petitioners. The respondents were left free to proceed in accordance with law by issuing a show cause notice.