TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessment order set aside for GST return mismatches due to improper service and natural justice violations</h1> <h3>Tvl. Surya Motors, Represented by its Partner, Mr. Mahaveer Purmia Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chennai</h3> Tvl. Surya Motors, Represented by its Partner, Mr. Mahaveer Purmia Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chennai - 2025 (95) G. S. T. L. 85 (Mad.) Issues:Challenge to impugned order dated 08.08.2024 for assessment year 2019-20 due to discrepancies in GST returns. Lack of service of show cause notices and assessment order on the petitioner. Request for opportunity to explain discrepancies and reliance on a recent judgment for remand. Request for depositing 10% of disputed tax and lifting of bank attachment.Analysis:The petitioner, engaged in retailing two-wheeler automobiles and registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, challenged the impugned order dated 08.08.2024 concerning discrepancies in GST returns for the assessment year 2019-20. Discrepancies included mismatches between GSTR-7, GSTR-3B, GSTR-1, and GSTR-8. The petitioner claimed that despite intimation and notices, they did not file returns or attend personal hearings, leading to the confirmation of the proposal in the impugned order.The petitioner contended that neither show cause notices nor the assessment order were served via proper channels, causing unawareness of the proceedings. They sought an opportunity to explain the discrepancies, citing a recent judgment for similar circumstances. The petitioner expressed readiness to pay 10% of the disputed tax and requested a final opportunity before the adjudicating authority to present objections, with a request to lift the bank attachment.The court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks. Upon compliance, the assessment order would be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner could submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. Failure to comply would result in the restoration of the assessment order. Recovery proceedings and bank attachments were to be lifted upon payment of 25% of disputed taxes within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
TaxTMI 