TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Affirms AO's 2017-18 Assessment; PCIT's Section 263 Invocation Deemed Baseless, No Legal Questions Found.</h1> <h3>The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawab, Noida and another Versus M/s. Sampark Management Consultancy LLP.</h3> The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Aaykar Bhawab, Noida and another Versus M/s. Sampark Management Consultancy LLP. - 2024:AHC:188411 - DB Issues:Appeal against order under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding Assessment Year 2017-18.Analysis:The respondent-assessee, engaged in trading shares and securities, filed its return for AY 2017-18, selected for scrutiny due to excess claim of exemption of dividend income and increase in unsecured loans. The AO accepted the returned income after detailed examination and issued the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act. The PCIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, invoking powers under Section 263, directing the AO to conduct specific inquiries. The Tribunal, after hearing, concluded that the AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial, quashing the PCIT's order.The appellant argued that the PCIT observed the assessment order lacked inquiries or verifications, falling under Explanation 2 of Section 263(1), raising substantial questions of law. The respondent contended that the assessment was done diligently under Section 143(3), with detailed questionnaires and evidence. The Tribunal found the AO conducted thorough inquiries and verifications, reaching valid conclusions on the issues raised.The PCIT's order under Section 263 cited lack of required inquiries and verifications by the AO, triggering jurisdiction under the Act. The Tribunal noted the AO issued multiple notices and questionnaires, with detailed responses from the assessee, totaling about 300 pages. The Tribunal found the AO's conclusions well-founded based on documentary evidence provided by the assessee.After detailed scrutiny, the Tribunal concluded that the PCIT's reasons for invoking Section 263 were baseless, as the AO had diligently conducted inquiries and verifications. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law raised by the appellant's counsel. The judgment upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the lack of merit in the appeal and dismissing it accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
