Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on opting for small scale industry exemption, the manufacturer was required to reverse CENVAT credit in respect of returned stabilizers lying in stock on the date the option was exercised, where the returned goods had been treated as inputs under the credit scheme.
Analysis: Rule 16(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 permits credit of duty paid on goods returned to the factory for being remade, refined or re-conditioned, and such returned goods are treated as inputs for CENVAT purposes. Rule 11(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 requires reversal of credit relatable to inputs lying in stock, in process, or contained in final products lying in stock on the date the exemption option is exercised. Since the returned stabilizers were already lying in stock when the exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. dated 01.03.2003 was opted for, the credit availed on those returned goods had to be reversed. The fact that some clearances were later made on payment of duty after crossing the exemption limit did not affect the liability arising on the date of opting for exemption.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of CENVAT credit and the related interest was correctly confirmed and is upheld against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: When a manufacturer who has taken credit on returned goods treated as inputs opts for SSI exemption, credit attributable to such goods lying in stock on the date of option must be reversed under Rule 11(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.