TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Penalty Reconsideration Ordered After Assessee's Successful Appeal on 2016-17 Income Declaration.</h1> <h3>Jayasakthi Knit Wear Versus The ITO, Ward-1 (4), Tirupur</h3> The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee's appeal against the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2016-17. ... Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - Appeal against quantum assessment is still pending - HELD THAT:- Bearing on the penalty as contented by assessee for the interest of natural justice and fair play, we set-aside the impugned order of the CIT(A) and direct him to pass orders [in the appeal preferred against levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c)] after deciding the quantum appeal of the assessee for AY 2016-17. Assessee is at liberty to raise all the issues before the Ld.CIT(A) and the Ld.CIT(A) to decide the penalty appeal after passing/adjudicating the grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee against the assessment order for AY 2016-17. The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal of the assessee against the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2016-17. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to decide on the penalty after adjudicating the quantum appeal of the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
