Appellant entitled to interest on sanctioned refund from three months after application date under Section 27A

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that appellant was entitled to interest on sanctioned refund calculated from three months after application date, not from the date of Commissioner (Appeals) remand order. The tribunal found that the explanation to Section 27A was inapplicable since refund sanction was passed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs. Following SC precedent in Ranbaxy Laboratories, interest liability commences three months from application receipt date, not from refund order date. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Eligibility for interest on sanctioned refund.
2. Commencement date for interest calculation on delayed refunds.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Interest on Sanctioned Refund:

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the sanctioned refund. The appellant's claim for a refund was initially denied by the adjudicating authority but was later sanctioned and credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. Upon appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the case to the adjudicating authority, which then sanctioned the refund, acknowledging there was no unjust enrichment. The appellant argues that interest should be granted from three months after the date of the refund application until the refund is sanctioned, relying on several legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Union of India.

2. Commencement Date for Interest Calculation on Delayed Refunds:

The core legal question is determining the commencement date for calculating interest on delayed refunds. The appellant contends that interest should accrue from three months after the refund application date, as per Section 27A of the Customs Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) had denied interest based on an explanation appended to Section 27A, which the appellant argues is not applicable since the refund order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs.

The tribunal examined the legal precedents, particularly the Supreme Court's interpretation in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., which clarified that interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act becomes payable if the refund is not granted within three months from the date of the refund application. The tribunal emphasized that the explanation to Section 11BB does not alter the commencement date for interest calculation, which remains three months post-application receipt.

The tribunal also referenced several other judgments and circulars from the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which consistently interpret Section 11BB as mandating interest payment starting three months after the refund application date. The tribunal concluded that the appellant is entitled to interest from the date three months after the refund application was filed until the refund is sanctioned.

Conclusion:

Based on the established legal position and the tribunal's analysis, the appellant is entitled to interest on the sanctioned refund from three months after the application date until the refund is sanctioned. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, affirming the appellant's right to interest as claimed.

---