GST registration cancellation quashed for procedural violations and failure to serve proper show cause notice

The Allahabad HC quashed the GST registration cancellation order dated 15.3.2024 due to procedural violations. The petitioner's registration was cancelled for not filing returns for six continuous months without proper service of show cause notice, violating natural justice principles. The petitioner claimed coverage under Section 10 of the GST Act, 2017, making the notice issuance incorrect. The HC found the impugned order to be non-speaking and remanded the matter to the jurisdictional authority. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority and file response to the show cause notice dated 6.2.2024, raising all pleas including registration under Section 10 provisions. The petition was disposed of through remand for fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge against cancellation of GST registration based on non-filing of returns for six months; Petitioner's claim of being registered under Composition Scheme and covered under Section 10 of the Act, 2017; Allegation of non-application of mind in passing cancellation order; Request for quashing and setting aside the cancellation order due to incorrect application of provisions.

Analysis:
The writ petition challenged the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration due to non-filing of returns for six months. The petitioner, registered under the Composition Scheme and claiming to fall under Section 10 of the Act, 2017, argued that the notice and subsequent cancellation order were based on incorrect provisions. The petitioner contended that the order failed to consider the specific provisions applicable to their case, as they were required to file quarterly and annual returns, not monthly returns as mentioned in the notice.

The petitioner highlighted that the cancellation order did not provide a reasoned explanation and reflected a lack of application of mind. The petitioner argued that the provisions cited in the order were not applicable to their situation, as they fell under Section 10 of the Act, 2017. The petitioner emphasized that the show cause notice and the subsequent order were issued under a mistaken impression regarding their tax status, leading to an incorrect decision.

In response, the counsel for the respondents pointed out the absence of specific averments in the petition regarding the petitioner's status under Section 10 of the Act, 2017. However, the counsel acknowledged that the cancellation order lacked a detailed rationale. The court, considering the petitioner's claim and the deficiencies in the cancellation process, quashed and set aside the cancellation order. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the jurisdictional authority, raise all relevant arguments, including their registration under Section 10, and respond to the show cause notice.

The court remanded the matter back to the authority for a fresh decision in accordance with the law. The authority was instructed to hear the petitioner's submissions and issue a new order after considering all relevant aspects, including the petitioner's status under Section 10. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority on a specified date to present their case. With these directions, the court disposed of the petition, providing the petitioner with an opportunity to address the issues raised and seek a fair reconsideration of the cancellation decision.

---