1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>GST Rate Challenge Dismissed: Petitioner Advised to File Substantive Appeal Within 90-Day Statutory Window</h1> HC rejected the writ petition challenging a GST rate order, finding the adjudicating authority's decision was reasoned and substantive. The court directed ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - Violation of principles of natural justice - order of the adjudicating authority does not address all the issues which were raised by the petitioner in its reply - rate of GST on activities undertaken - HELD THAT:- What should be the extent or length of logic and reasoning, is not decisive as to whether writ petition should be entertained or the party should be driven to exhaust the alternative remedy available under the law. It is satisfied that the order passed by the adjudicating authority cannot be said to be of a nature that it does not speak anything or does not decide anything. Even if there may be some merits in the submissions of learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that order is wrong and illegal, that by itself, without anything more, would not impress this Court to entertain this petition despite existence of alternate and efficacious statutory remedy of appeal provided under the governing law. Present being not a case of absence of jurisdiction, violation of principles of natural justice or malice, it is not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the adjudicating authority only on that ground, though without expressing any opinion on merits. Taking into consideration that the petition was filed before expiry of period of limitation for filing appeal, it is directed that if the petitioner prefers appeal within a period of 90 days from today, the appellate authority shall examine and decide the appeal on its own merits without going into the issue of limitation - petition disposed off. The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order of the adjudicating authority regarding GST rate, stating that the order was not non-speaking and did address the issues raised by the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal within 90 days, which would be considered on its own merits without the issue of limitation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
