Alternate statutory remedy bars writ challenge to a GST adjudication order, with liberty to pursue the appellate route.

A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was declined because an alternate statutory appeal was available, and the court held that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked in preference to that remedy. The petitioner's argument that the order was non-speaking was not accepted as a ground to bypass the appellate mechanism. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated time.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the adjudicating authority's GST order was maintainable despite the availability of an alternate statutory appeal, and whether the order was so non-speaking as to justify writ interference.

Outcome: The petition was not entertained on the ground of alternate remedy, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated time.

---