TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition Dismissed: Transportation Service Provider Advised to Appeal Due to Hearing Notification Dispute.</h1> <h3>Manish Benimadhav Singh Versus Union of India & Anr.</h3> Manish Benimadhav Singh Versus Union of India & Anr. - 2024:GUJHC:66650 - DB Issues:Opportunity of personal hearing not provided to the petitioner leading to disputed facts challenging the Order-in-Original.Analysis:The petitioner, engaged in the business of providing transportation services, received a notice from the Joint Commissioner regarding non-disclosure of taxable services for certain years. The petitioner raised objections, including the application of the Reverse Charge Mechanism and exemption from tax. Despite requests for adjournment, the respondent passed an order confirming a substantial demand. The Order-in-Original indicated multiple opportunities for personal hearings, but the petitioner claimed no communication was received regarding fixing the date. This conflicting information led to a disputed question of fact. The court dismissed the petition on the grounds of challenging factual elements and directed the petitioner to appeal to the Appellate Authority. The court clarified that the time spent in court should be considered bona fide by the Appellate Authority for any potential delay in filing the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
