Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be permitted to avail the special procedure for rectification of the demand order concerning wrong availment of input tax credit, and whether coercive action should remain stayed until such rectification application is decided.
Analysis: The order records the notification introducing a special rectification procedure for registered persons against whom demand orders under the GST provisions had been issued for wrong availment of input tax credit, where such credit has become available under the amended provisions. The petitioner concurred with this course and sought acceptance of the rectification application manually if portal difficulties arose. The Court accordingly directed the petitioner to file the rectification application before the competent authority within two weeks and directed expeditious processing by the respondents.
Outcome: The petitioner was permitted to pursue the special rectification procedure, and the respondents were restrained from taking coercive action until disposal of the application.