Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate guarantee given by the assessee in favour of its associated enterprise constituted an international transaction requiring benchmarking and, if so, whether the transfer pricing adjustment should be restricted to 0.5%.
Analysis: The corporate guarantee was treated as an international transaction liable to be benchmarked under transfer pricing principles. The rate adopted by the transfer pricing authority on the basis of Indian bank guarantee comparables was not accepted, as the beneficiary banking arrangement was abroad and the tribunal relied on consistent coordinate bench and jurisdictional precedent that corporate guarantee commission is ordinarily benchmarked at a much lower rate. The judicial trend cited by the tribunal supported adoption of 0.5% as a reasonable arm's length commission for corporate guarantee transactions.
Conclusion: The corporate guarantee was required to be benchmarked, but the adjustment was confined to 0.5%, which is in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the transfer pricing issue relating to corporate guarantee, with the addition reduced to the lower benchmark rate and the appeal otherwise allowed in part.
Ratio Decidendi: Corporate guarantee given to an associated enterprise is an international transaction requiring arm's length benchmarking, and in the absence of stronger comparable material, the benchmark commission may be restricted to 0.5% following settled precedent.