Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned proceedings pursuant to the notice in Form GST-DRC-01 and the consequential order under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could proceed when no notice under Section 65(3) of that Act had been issued before audit.
Analysis: The matter was considered in the context of the statutory scheme governing audit under Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which requires prior notice to the registered person before audit is conducted. The notice relied upon was in Form GST-DRC-01 with reference to Rule 100(2) and Rule 142(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, provisions which relate to assessment-related proceedings and not to a notice initiating audit under Section 65(3). No corresponding notice under Section 65(3) was shown to have been issued.
Outcome: A prima facie case was found in favour of the petitioner and further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice and order were stayed.