Tribunal Holds Off on Cess Payments Penalty Awaiting Supreme Court Ruling; No Intent to Evade Found.

The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and remitted the matter back to the Original Authority, instructing them to await the Supreme Court's decision on the pending case concerning the liability to pay Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess. The Tribunal determined that no penalty or interest should be imposed since the appellant had already paid the disputed cess along with interest, and there was no mens rea involved. This decision was pronounced in open court, effectively suspending further action until the Supreme Court's ruling provides clarity on the issue.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of statute regarding liability to pay Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess under a specific notification exempting Excise duty.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax. The appellant, a manufacturer of various goods, received an order under a Duty Credit Scrip scheme without paying the appropriate duty. The Revenue contended that the exemption under Notification No. 33/2022-CE did not cover Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess. The Original Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand for duty along with interest and penalty. The appellant approached the first Appellate Authority, which also dismissed the appeal, leading to the current appeal.

The appellant argued that when Excise duty is exempted, Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess are also automatically exempted, citing CBEC Circulars. The appellant relied on legal precedents to support their case, including judgments involving Hero Moto Corp Ltd., Bajaj Auto Ltd., and Unicorn Industries. The conflicting decisions in these cases led to a referral to a Larger Bench by the Supreme Court, creating uncertainty regarding the liability to pay the mentioned cess.

The Tribunal noted the lack of clarity on the liability to pay Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess in the present case due to the pending matter before the Supreme Court. Considering the sub-judice nature of the issue, the Tribunal found no mens rea on the part of the Taxpayer. The appellant had already remitted the disputed cess along with interest, eliminating the basis for imposing a penalty under Section 25 of the Central Excise Rules.

As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and remitted the matter back to the Original Authority to await the Supreme Court's decision in the pending case. The Tribunal directed that no penalty or interest should be levied, as the appellant had already fulfilled the cess payment obligations. The decision was pronounced in open court on a specified date.

---