Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax for filing an appeal under the GST law can be paid by debiting the Electronic Credit Ledger.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permits the amount in the Electronic Credit Ledger to be used for payment towards output tax. The Court read the pre-deposit requirement under the appellate provision as a payment linked to discharge of tax liability, not as a barred category of payment outside the GST credit mechanism. It also relied on the governing rules and the CBIC circular clarifying that payment towards output tax, including amounts payable as a consequence of GST proceedings, may be made through the Electronic Credit Ledger, and noted that the only stated restriction concerned reverse charge liability, which was not involved here.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit under the appellate provision can be made by debiting the Electronic Credit Ledger, and the deficiency memo rejecting that mode of payment is unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the GST framework and binding circulars permit utilisation of the Electronic Credit Ledger for payment towards output tax, the statutory pre-deposit required for filing an appeal may also be discharged through that ledger, except where a specific statutory restriction applies.