Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a resident of the UAE, was entitled to the benefit of the India-UAE DTAA in respect of capital gains arising from sale of mutual fund units, even though no actual tax was paid or payable in the UAE on such income.
Analysis: Section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 enables treaty relief for avoidance of double taxation and for granting relief where the treaty applies to residents of the contracting states. The applicable treaty provisions cover residents of one or both states, and the expression "resident" in Article 4(1) is linked to being liable to tax by reason of domicile, residence, place of management, place of incorporation, or a similar criterion. The reasoning adopted follows the settled view that actual payment of tax in the other contracting state is not a condition precedent for treaty protection. The treaty operates even where the other state has the right to tax but does not in fact levy tax, and it is not confined to cases of current double taxation alone. On the facts, the assessee's UAE residency and the treaty allocation of taxing rights brought the capital gains within Article 13(5), so the gains were not taxable in India under the treaty.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the India-UAE DTAA, and the capital gains from sale of mutual fund units were not taxable in India under the treaty.