Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the goods manufactured were unglazed ceramic wall tiles classifiable under sub-heading 6907 10 90, or burnt clay building bricks and tiles falling under heading 6904 10 00 and roofing tiles under heading 6905 10 00. (ii) Whether SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 01.03.2011 was available.
Issue (i): Whether the goods manufactured were unglazed ceramic wall tiles classifiable under sub-heading 6907 10 90, or burnt clay building bricks and tiles falling under heading 6904 10 00 and roofing tiles under heading 6905 10 00.
Analysis: The classification dispute was treated as settled by prior orders in the assessee's own case and by other connected matters involving identical products and manufacturing processes. The goods were found to be burnt clay bricks and tiles manufactured from locally available clay and fired in kilns, and not ceramic wall tiles. The impugned classification adopted by the department was therefore not accepted.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 01.03.2011 was available.
Analysis: Once the goods were held to be classifiable as burnt clay bricks and tiles, the exemption claim under the notification survived on the same footing as in the earlier accepted decisions. No separate adverse finding was sustained against the assessee on this issue.
Conclusion: SSI exemption was held to be available to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand, penalties, and connected adverse orders were set aside, and all four appeals were allowed with consequential relief as per law.