Classification of Low Aromatic White Spirit turned on incomplete testing, defeating reclassification, confiscation and penalty.

CESTAT Kolkata held that imported goods declared as Low Aromatic White Spirit were not shown with certainty to be Kerosene, because the Department's laboratory report did not test several parameters required under IS 1459:2018. On that technical record, the goods were classified under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1990 rather than 2710 1910. Once the declared classification was accepted, the alleged misdeclaration and foreign trade breach could not survive, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside as consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the imported goods, declared as Low Aromatic White Spirit, were correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1990 or were liable to be reclassified as Kerosene under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1910; (ii) whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could be sustained once the classification dispute was resolved in favour of the importer.

Issue (i): Whether the imported goods, declared as Low Aromatic White Spirit, were correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1990 or were liable to be reclassified as Kerosene under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1910.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the laboratory report relied upon by the Department did not establish the goods as Kerosene with certainty because several relevant parameters under IS 1459:2018 were not tested. The comparative discussion showed material gaps in the testing, including parameters critical for the Kerosene specification, and the report was therefore held insufficient to support reclassification. The Tribunal also accepted the technical material showing that Low Aromatic White Spirit and similar light oils may fall within the same tariff heading, and relied on the similarity of the goods to earlier decided matters.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be Low Aromatic White Spirit and were classified under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1990, not under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1910.

Issue (ii): Whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could be sustained once the classification dispute was resolved in favour of the importer.

Analysis: Since the goods were held not to be Kerosene and the importer's declared classification was accepted, the alleged violation of the foreign trade restrictions and the basis for confiscation disappeared. The Tribunal consequently held that the findings of misdeclaration and breach of the import policy could not survive, and the ancillary order for redemption fine and penalty also could not be sustained.

Conclusion: Confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside and the importer succeeded on the consequential reliefs.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the imported goods were accepted as Low Aromatic White Spirit classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2710 1990, and all consequential adverse measures were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the Department's test report does not conclusively establish the goods as falling within the rival restricted classification, and the importer's claimed description is supported by the remaining technical material, reclassification, confiscation and penalty cannot be sustained.

---