Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from supply of software, together with installation, testing, commissioning and AMC, constituted royalty taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The assessee was a Singapore resident without a permanent establishment in India. The arrangement showed supply of software under a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence, and the end-user licence agreement stated that no title or ownership in the software or documentation was transferred. The Court applied the principle that consideration for mere use of software, without transfer of any right in the copyright, is not royalty. It further held that the treaty definition, being narrower and more beneficial, prevails over the expanded domestic definition. The contractual restrictions showed only a copyrighted article was supplied, not any copyright or right to use copyright.
Conclusion: The receipts were not royalty and were not chargeable to tax in India under section 9(1)(vi) or Article 12 of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Final Conclusion: The software supply transaction was held to be outside the royalty charge, and the addition was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment for a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to use software, where no right or interest in the underlying copyright is transferred, is not royalty; the treaty definition prevails where it is more beneficial to the assessee.