ITAT deletes additions under sections 69 and 69C as loose sheets found during search lacked evidentiary value without corroborative evidence

ITAT Chennai deleted additions made under sections 69 and 69C regarding unexplained investments and cash expenditure. The revenue relied on loose sheets found during search proceedings, but the tribunal held these were "dumb documents" lacking evidentiary value as they contained only approximate project expenses without basic details like dates, payees, or payment sources. The assessee had already admitted additional income from search proceedings in earlier years, and all expenses were properly recorded in books. Without corroborative evidence establishing actual unaccounted cash payments, the additions were deemed arbitrary and unsustainable.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of wages payable for Rs. 424.49 Lacs.
2. Addition of unexplained investment under Section 69 for Rs. 85 Lacs.
3. Addition under Section 69C for Rs. 2033 Lacs.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Wages Payable:
The disallowance of wages payable amounting to Rs. 424.49 Lacs was based on discrepancies found in Measurement books and excel sheets compared with regular Tally Data. The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded that the assessee booked wages payable in the last month of various financial years to suppress profits. Despite the assessee's submissions, the AO made the addition, which was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The tribunal found that the issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee for the Assessment Year 2017-18, where it was determined that the expenditure was not bogus but only a timing difference. The provision for wages had been reversed, and the payment made in the subsequent year should be allowable as an expense of that year to avoid double disallowance. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the impugned addition.

2. Addition of Unexplained Investment under Section 69 for Rs. 85 Lacs:
The addition was based on an excel sheet found during the search, allegedly reflecting capital introduction by partners. The AO added the amount to the income of the assessee after rejecting their submissions. The tribunal found that the issue had been similarly adjudicated in the assessee's favor for the Assessment Year 2018-19. It was noted that the loose sheets lacked evidentiary value, as they contained mere calculations without corroborative evidence. The tribunal emphasized that no concrete evidence was provided to substantiate the claim of unexplained investment, and thus, the addition was deleted.

3. Addition under Section 69C for Rs. 2033 Lacs:
This addition was based on an excel sheet titled 'sheet 7' found during search proceedings, which allegedly contained unaccounted cash payments for non-business purposes. The AO added the amount to the income of the assessee, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The tribunal found that the loose sheet was a dumb document with no evidentiary value. The tribunal noted that the notings lacked basic details such as date of payment, payees, and source, rendering them insufficient to support the addition. The tribunal concluded that the presumption of unexplained expenditure was arbitrary and unsupported by corroborative evidence. Therefore, the addition was deleted.

Conclusion:
The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting the additions related to disallowance of wages payable, unexplained investment under Section 69, and alleged unexplained expenditure under Section 69C, while dismissing the legal grounds raised by the assessee due to lack of material arguments.

---