TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of appellant, overturning Service Tax demand for laying pipelines</h1> <h3>A Sekar Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax demand and penalty imposed for laying pipelines, ... Erection, commissioning or installation services- Service Tax demand has been confirmed against the appellant herein and penalty imposed, holding that the activity of laying of pipelines amounts to “Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service” liable to tax. In the light of the decision of Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. CCE 2008 -TMI - 30780 - CESTAT, CHENNAI, held that- set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax demand and penalty imposed for laying pipelines, citing a previous decision that laying pipelines does not fall under 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service' liable to tax. The Tribunal's decision in Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.'s case was followed, as the issue was already covered by that decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
