Refund of service tax on waived consideration: retrospective fee waiver and nil renegotiation removed taxable value under the negative list regime.

Service tax under the negative list regime depended on the existence of a service provided for consideration under section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. Where the service fee for marketing and allied support services was later waived pursuant to an AGM decision and written order, and the invoice value was renegotiated to nil, the consideration was retrospectively extinguished. On those facts, the waived portion ceased to retain the character of taxable service, and the tax element reflected in the credit notes became refundable to the recipients. The refund claim was therefore allowed in respect of the tax paid on the waived consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax paid on service fee became refundable when the fee was retrospectively waived and the invoice value was renegotiated to nil.

Analysis: The refund claim arose in the negative list regime, where levy under section 66B depended upon the existence of a service for consideration within section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. The service fee originally charged by the appellant for marketing and allied support services was subsequently waived pursuant to the AGM decision and written order, and the amount was credited back to the milk unions. On these facts, the consideration stood retrospectively extinguished, and the transaction, to the extent of the waived amount, no longer retained the character of a taxable service. The waiver was treated as a renegotiation of the contract value rather than a mere post-tax adjustment, and the credit notes reflected return of the tax element to the recipients.

Conclusion: The service tax paid on the waived consideration was refundable, and the appellant succeeded on the refund claim.

---