Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders passed under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, disallowing input tax credit under Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, were liable to be quashed and the matters remitted for fresh consideration after furnishing copies of the cancellation orders of the selling dealers.
Analysis: The challenge concerned assessments made on the footing that input tax credit had been availed from dealers whose registrations stood cancelled. The petitioner contended that the cancellation was retrospective and that the actual cancellation orders had not been supplied. The Court found that the impugned orders required reconsideration after furnishing the cancellation orders and giving the petitioner an opportunity to file a fresh or additional reply. The Court also directed the Assessing Officer to consider the decision of the Division Bench in Tvl. Sahyadri Industries Ltd. while passing fresh orders on merits.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were quashed and the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication after furnishing the cancellation orders and considering the petitioner's further reply.