TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessment reopening under Section 147 barred after insolvency resolution plan approval extinguishes all pre-approval liabilities</h1> <h3>Ausil Corporation Private Limited Versus Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1), Rajkot & Anr.</h3> Ausil Corporation Private Limited Versus Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1), Rajkot & Anr. - 2024:GUJHC:57227 - DB Issues:Challenge to notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and order under Section 148A (d) for Assessment Year 2015-16.Detailed Analysis:1. Challenge to Notices and Order:The petitioner, a company under the Companies Act, challenged notices dated 05.04.2021 and 29.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and an order dated 29.07.2022 under Section 148A (d) for Assessment Year 2015-16. The petitioner had filed its original return of income for the said assessment year declaring a total loss. Subsequently, insolvency proceedings were initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, leading to the approval of a resolution plan by the Tribunal. The resolution plan provided for payment to operational creditors, including the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot. The petitioner contended that all past dues of the Income Tax Department were extinguished post-approval of the resolution plan, and therefore, the impugned notices and order should be quashed. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision to support its argument.2. Arguments by Petitioner and Respondent:The petitioner's advocate argued that the past dues of the Income Tax Department were extinguished post-approval of the resolution plan, warranting the quashing of the notices and order. On the other hand, the Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent contended that the notices were issued to reassess the income for the relevant assessment year, emphasizing the statutory provisions that empower the respondent to take such actions. The respondent also argued that the Supreme Court decision cited by the petitioner was not applicable to the present case as it pertained to recovery proceedings, which differed from the current scenario.3. Judicial Analysis and Decision:After considering the submissions from both parties and examining the record, the Court noted the approval of the resolution plan post-insolvency proceedings. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the Court highlighted that upon approval of a resolution plan, all liabilities of stakeholders, including government and statutory authorities, stand extinguished. Consequently, the Court quashed the notices dated 05.04.2021 and 29.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act, along with the order passed under Section 148A (d) dated 29.07.2022. The Court allowed the petition, making the rule absolute and refraining from issuing any costs.In conclusion, the Court's decision was based on the principle that post-approval of a resolution plan in insolvency proceedings, all liabilities, including those owed to government entities, are extinguished. This legal interpretation led to the quashing of the notices and order challenged by the petitioner, providing a favorable outcome in the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
