Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's 4 appeals challenging assessment orders relating to 399 Bills of Entry were maintainable under Rule 6A of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982.
Analysis: Rule 6A permits a single memorandum of appeal where one order deals with multiple bills of entry, but its Explanation requires as many appeals as there are orders-in-original where the impugned order-in-appeal relates to more than one original order. The assessment of each Bill of Entry is treated as an independent assessment order. The appeal requirement is therefore to be tested Bill of Entry-wise, and the number of appeals must correspond to the number of assessment orders challenged. The cited authorities on Rule 6A and the litigation policy were applied to hold that the monetary threshold and appeal maintainability cannot be aggregated across multiple independent assessments.
Conclusion: The 4 Revenue appeals were not maintainable, and separate appeals were required for the individual Bills of Entry.
Ratio Decidendi: Where each Bill of Entry constitutes a separate assessment order, the appellant must file a corresponding appeal for each such assessment challenged; a consolidated appeal is not maintainable merely because the disputes arise from similar facts or a common order-in-appeal.