TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Order Quashed: Duplicate Tax Period Issue Resolved, Writ Petition Allowed, Rights Preserved for Final 2021 Order.</h1> <h3>M/s. Jain Cement Udyog (Through its Proprietor Sh. Sanjay Jain) Versus Sales Tax Officer Class-II/ Avato Ward 201 Zone 11 Delhi.</h3> The HC quashed the order dated 23 April 2024, as it related to the same tax period already addressed by a final order on 01 February 2021. The writ ... Rectification of apparent mistake underlying the passing of the impugned order - tax period of July 2018 to March 2019 - HELD THAT:- It is informed that the writ petitioner has preferred an appeal against the order of 01 February 2021. In view of the aforesaid and admitted facts which emerge, it is apparent that the impugned order of 23 April 2024 would not sustain - petition allowed. The High Court quashed the order dated 23 April 2024 as it pertained to the same tax period for which a final order was already passed on 01 February 2021. The writ petition was allowed on this ground, and all rights and contentions regarding the order of 01 February 2021 were kept open.
TaxTMI 
