Finance Act 2024 amendments make Covid-19 time extension challenge redundant, input tax credit benefits restored

Gauhati HC disposed of a writ petition challenging notifications extending time limits under Section 73 of CGST/AGST Act, 2017 due to Covid-19. The court held that amendments introduced by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 rendered the challenge redundant. Petitioner became entitled to input tax credit benefits under newly inserted Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of CGST Act, 2017. The impugned order was set aside and proceedings including show-cause notice were deemed redundant. Matter remanded to competent jurisdictional officer for appropriate orders.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Extension of the due date for filing annual returns under Section 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017 due to Covid-19 Pandemic.
2. Invocation of "force majeure" under Section 168A of the CGST Act, 2017 for extending time limits.
3. Validity of notifications extending the period for issuance of orders under Section 73.
4. Amendments to Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 and their retrospective effect.
5. Entitlement to input tax credit under the amended provisions.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Extension of Due Date for Filing Annual Returns:

The judgment discusses the requirement under Section 44 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017 for assessees to file annual returns electronically in form GSTR-9 by the due date. For the financial year 2017-18, the original deadline was 31.12.2018, which was extended multiple times due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. The final extension for Assam was up to 07.02.2020. The extensions were made under the authority of Section 168A, which allows the government to extend deadlines under special circumstances.

2. Invocation of "Force Majeure" under Section 168A:

Section 168A was invoked to justify extensions due to the Covid-19 Pandemic, which was considered a "force majeure" condition. This provision allows the government to extend time limits for actions that cannot be completed due to such conditions. The petitioner challenged the continued use of "force majeure" beyond 2022, arguing that the pandemic's impact had subsided, making further extensions unjustified.

3. Validity of Notifications Extending Issuance Period of Orders:

The petitioner contested notifications No. 09/2023-Central Tax and No. 56/2023-Central Tax, which extended the period for issuing orders under Section 73. The petitioner argued that the extensions were not bona fide, as the pandemic was no longer a valid reason. The court considered the petitioner's grievance but noted that the GST Council had recommended these extensions due to difficulties faced during the pandemic.

4. Amendments to Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017:

The judgment highlights amendments to Section 16, which governs eligibility for input tax credit. The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 introduced sub-sections 5 and 6, allowing registered persons to claim input tax credit for financial years 2017-18 to 2020-21 in returns filed by 30th November 2021. The amendments took effect from 27.09.2024, with retrospective application from 01.07.2017.

5. Entitlement to Input Tax Credit Under Amended Provisions:

The court noted that the amendments to Section 16 rendered the petitioner's challenge moot, as the petitioner was now entitled to claim input tax credit for the relevant period. The amendments provided a legal basis for the petitioner's claims, subject to compliance with the conditions in the newly inserted sub-sections.

Conclusion:

The court concluded that the amendments to Section 16 addressed the petitioner's grievances, allowing the petitioner to claim input tax credit for the disputed period. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the competent jurisdictional officer for further action if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of in light of the statutory amendments and the retrospective effect granted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024.

---